From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Seagate hard drives with dual actuators.
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 19:59:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_=wRMUyiVxusY9eSQtUEg9y7SLr=qvTvgZbGftm33fMNg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63e3fac6-1758-b5c2-2c92-312d64d547e3@gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 6:10 PM Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The biggest downside to the large drives available now, even if SMART
> tells you a drive is failing, you likely won't have time to copy the
> data over to a new drive before it fails. On a 18TB drive, using
> pvmove, it can take a long time to move data.
Very true. This is why I'm essentially running RAID6. Well, that and
for various reasons you don't want to allow writes to Ceph without at
least one drive worth of redundancy, so having an extra replica means
that you can lose one and remain read-write, and then if you lose a
second during recovery you might be read-only but you still have data
integrity. (Don't want to get into details - it is a Ceph-specific
issue.)
> I don't even want to think what it would cost to put
> all my 100TBs or so on SSD or NVME drives. WOW!!!
# kubectl rook-ceph ceph osd df class ssd
ID CLASS WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE RAW USE DATA OMAP
META AVAIL %USE VAR PGS STATUS
8 ssd 6.98630 1.00000 7.0 TiB 1.7 TiB 1.7 TiB 63 MiB 3.9
GiB 5.3 TiB 24.66 1.04 179 up
4 ssd 1.74660 1.00000 1.7 TiB 465 GiB 462 GiB 16 MiB 2.5
GiB 1.3 TiB 25.99 1.10 45 up
12 ssd 1.74660 1.00000 1.7 TiB 547 GiB 545 GiB 30 MiB 2.1
GiB 1.2 TiB 30.57 1.29 52 up
1 ssd 6.98630 1.00000 7.0 TiB 1.7 TiB 1.7 TiB 50 MiB 4.2
GiB 5.3 TiB 24.42 1.03 177 up
5 ssd 6.98630 1.00000 7.0 TiB 1.8 TiB 1.8 TiB 24 MiB 5.0
GiB 5.2 TiB 25.14 1.07 180 up
3 ssd 1.74660 1.00000 1.7 TiB 585 GiB 583 GiB 18 MiB 2.0
GiB 1.2 TiB 32.70 1.39 57 up
21 ssd 1.74660 1.00000 1.7 TiB 470 GiB 468 GiB 27 MiB 1.9
GiB 1.3 TiB 26.26 1.11 52 up
9 ssd 1.74660 1.00000 1.7 TiB 506 GiB 504 GiB 11 MiB 2.0
GiB 1.3 TiB 28.29 1.20 49 up
18 ssd 1.74660 1.00000 1.7 TiB 565 GiB 563 GiB 16 MiB 1.7
GiB 1.2 TiB 31.59 1.34 55 up
10 ssd 1.74660 1.00000 1.7 TiB 490 GiB 489 GiB 28 MiB 1.6
GiB 1.3 TiB 27.42 1.16 53 up
22 ssd 1.74660 1.00000 1.7 TiB 479 GiB 478 GiB 19 MiB 1.7
GiB 1.3 TiB 26.80 1.14 50 up
19 ssd 13.97249 1.00000 14 TiB 2.3 TiB 2.3 TiB 87 MiB 5.2
GiB 12 TiB 16.81 0.71 262 up
TOTAL 49 TiB 12 TiB 12 TiB 388 MiB 34
GiB 37 TiB 23.61
I'm getting there. Granted, at 3+2 erasure coding that's only a bit
over 30TiB usable space.
--
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-15 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-13 23:10 [gentoo-user] Seagate hard drives with dual actuators Dale
2024-11-14 0:46 ` Matt Jolly
2024-11-14 13:05 ` Dale
2024-11-14 7:55 ` Wols Lists
2024-11-14 16:48 ` Dale
2024-11-15 0:18 ` [OT] " Peter Humphrey
2024-11-15 8:41 ` [gentoo-user] Hollerith (was: Seagate hard drives with dual actuators) karl
2024-11-15 9:51 ` [OT] Re: [gentoo-user] Seagate hard drives with dual actuators Wols Lists
2024-11-14 11:21 ` Michael
2024-11-14 17:00 ` Dale
2024-11-14 19:12 ` Michael
2024-11-14 19:51 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2024-11-14 19:55 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2024-11-14 23:14 ` Peter Humphrey
2024-11-14 20:33 ` Dale
2024-11-14 20:57 ` Rich Freeman
2024-11-14 23:10 ` Dale
2024-11-15 0:59 ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2024-11-15 5:53 ` Dale
2024-11-15 10:09 ` Michael
2024-11-15 11:59 ` Dale
2024-11-15 15:35 ` Michael
2024-11-15 16:36 ` Dale
2024-11-15 22:13 ` Rich Freeman
2024-11-16 11:02 ` Michael
2024-11-16 14:36 ` Rich Freeman
2024-11-16 19:47 ` Michael
2024-11-16 20:13 ` Rich Freeman
2024-11-16 23:21 ` Wol
2024-11-17 11:22 ` Michael
2024-11-17 21:26 ` Rich Freeman
2024-11-17 23:04 ` Jack
2024-11-18 0:23 ` Rich Freeman
2024-11-18 2:32 ` Matt Jolly
2024-11-15 10:38 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2024-11-15 12:19 ` Dale
2024-11-14 22:38 ` Wols Lists
2024-11-15 9:35 ` Michael
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGfcS_=wRMUyiVxusY9eSQtUEg9y7SLr=qvTvgZbGftm33fMNg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rich0@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox