From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC08158232 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2024 16:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC07AE0D17; Sun, 8 Dec 2024 16:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw1-x112a.google.com (mail-yw1-x112a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF784E0C4B for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2024 16:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw1-x112a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6efa1e49ef0so36619937b3.2 for ; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 08:17:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1733674648; x=1734279448; darn=lists.gentoo.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=F+xrjWRqOBhiBmVJlS2/x5jAFFnXYOVj/isdNT3HD/0=; b=RbDHd3qKGMIkAEJ2LRaom05RXzzSmXpJKUB23u+eZtVlzIjRToEGBG3q2dU7pJtc+d 6wMBo/eQhkXuZQFKTJbCdJQFsP8j1laiU+vboYX6t9qWgei1+UvdjCfI1TbtTtB2qjlJ kxCsjtrNqqug6gDSN8632e5+PmYCGlSr0pQsfiN8BZLKk8PF4TeekNvqpoRBGTYqVSge osScFoAn/eI/znXgiIh4QTeJdjIs9zMWjjlKo5u5tjGA+9rgz//FF/5q0r+6jgtQW1ks obPZTlOLOqtSVJ8Py3JjvQcFDJF7krKmuXgFD1ZAF4/wQAp7W1MynzinkeKizqsV/Iuo 0j/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1733674648; x=1734279448; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=F+xrjWRqOBhiBmVJlS2/x5jAFFnXYOVj/isdNT3HD/0=; b=OurttP3h5rhWxUfeIMShELrvio0seFky4U7mfoqNs4Q4tn/8Vzo3K2UOnVhHG8p973 UQuWXNDqLZD7/roK9tU/MOdNgMOr24qWv11Af0UYCNuzKmmf4P8sxocMVmV4zI90Y4HF 2Gth50HqftgNB9dvt0N3YamoORce/38ejUBO66l+usQ062sqZMZT4KIl+uXsCmSQd0xG tz04+Y7DdCg9Gb8ojOuZASowzFczYLmLthI00AaykzqFZ7GTwQ2kqH+3HpoRcIm0R2tP /BELE15idvJnls5eT3nVlxMz7CH8QyFMG0nHeLuCeqylP4r+j0vokArxHcB7LERtYUu1 3cWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywb/YYlbCHgjGM2I7tzvx2oUjH9lMq2evbpnI7HsAK+GUrjrSne xnPKXwbEUw3jJzKdMSTgm2tENkQZjzG3ozezabv/gts4GF1sEvkrMwEsaMjZuz/qaRe1+FRzC6H cgdQ0ku3oF7A9lub4ajixoUcTncxx4mHPSIE= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs7i+B9wEqXR1Gea4/M4lq9BPwvfM9hTNslL/kUrd+d7tuI7KJKERWUErxtIMp m32t2JXQIYJ5crYrwA7rrQ2UZxZQakQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGADXtMv5i7H0/MbiuApicM9AFdl6L7Lv1F1S4Hh768Qt+C5bfw8R4E/sugecftNubIPZlI6r58hH4+uzfE2ts= X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:4d47:b0:6ef:79d8:c908 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6efe3bf91a5mr97758627b3.14.1733674647685; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 08:17:27 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jacques Montier Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 17:17:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] No binary llvm-19.1.4 package To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008814620628c495af" X-Archives-Salt: 76cf513c-b389-42c8-9505-fccfe5823668 X-Archives-Hash: ce271894affb30edf67950f7199a16e4 --0000000000008814620628c495af Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le dim. 8 d=C3=A9c. 2024 =C3=A0 16:18, Eli Schwartz = a =C3=A9crit : > On 12/8/24 6:14 AM, Jacques Montier wrote: > > I have two Gentoo OS that are supposedly identical. > > > If the entire contents of /etc/portage are identical, then in theory you > should always get the same packages on both machines. Is it just the > package list or the entire portage configuration that is identical? > > > > My emerge world : > > emerge -auvDN --with-bdeps=3Dy --binpkg-respect-use=3Dy --keep-going w= orld > > > > emerge --info for the second OS in an attached file. > > > > > > Where could this difference be coming from? > > > Your use of --binpkg-respect-use=3Dy deletes one form of diagnostic. The > default behavior of portage without that flag specified is for portage to= : > > - respect USE flags > - verbosely log a warning if binaries were ineligible due to USE flags > > With that flag set to =3Dy, the verbose warning log is disabled. That is = all. > > Can you try running emerge without that flag? It should print a message > that looks a bit like this: > > > !!! The following binary packages have been ignored due to non matching > USE: > > =3Ddev-lang/python-3.13.1 llvm_slot_18 -verify-sig > =3Ddev-lang/python-3.13.1 llvm_slot_18 -pgo -verify-sig > > NOTE: The --binpkg-respect-use=3Dn option will prevent emerge > from ignoring these binary packages if possible. > Using --binpkg-respect-use=3Dy will silence this warning. > > If the issue is USE flags, then that will tell you. The lines printed > are valid package.use lines which would cause you to start using that > binary package. > > > -- > Eli Schwartz > Thank you Eli for your response. I saw that the two directories /etc/portage were different, particularly the make.conf files. So i copied the first one to replace the second, and everything went back to normal. I would have difficulty detecting where the differences between the two directories came from. Nevertheless, thank you again for helping me. Cheers, -- Jacques --0000000000008814620628c495af Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable




=
Le=C2=A0dim. 8 d=C3=A9c. 2024 =C3=A0=C2=A016:18, Eli Schwartz &= lt;eschwartz@gentoo.org> a = =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: