From: Jack <ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Seagate hard drives with dual actuators.
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:04:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VL43KSZM.WX4TAYHL.UQDT6CU2@3A7PDRNJ.4JWAS2OM.UYQRY47Q> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_kKM24kbw-f8QGkmLYgDm1Zc5jkkcnyNNr2dEbtyR8YbA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2024.11.17 16:26, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 6:22 AM Michael <confabulate@kintzios.com>
> wrote:
> > On Saturday 16 November 2024 20:13:30 GMT Rich Freeman wrote:
[snip ....]
> > It would be interesting to see how different fs types perform on
> DM-SMRs.
>
> Not that interesting, for me personally. That's like asking how well
> different filesystems would perform on tape. If I'm storing data on
> tape, I'll use an algorithm designed to work on tape, and a tape
> drive that actually has a command set that doesn't try to pretend
> that it is useful for random writes.
What about DEC-Tape? :-) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DECtape) (I
may even have a few left in a closet somewhere, if only I could find
someone to read them.)
> SMR is pretty analogous to tape, with the benefit of being as fast as
> CMR for random reads.
[snip ....]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-17 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-13 23:10 [gentoo-user] Seagate hard drives with dual actuators Dale
2024-11-14 0:46 ` Matt Jolly
2024-11-14 13:05 ` Dale
2024-11-14 7:55 ` Wols Lists
2024-11-14 16:48 ` Dale
2024-11-15 0:18 ` [OT] " Peter Humphrey
2024-11-15 8:41 ` [gentoo-user] Hollerith (was: Seagate hard drives with dual actuators) karl
2024-11-15 9:51 ` [OT] Re: [gentoo-user] Seagate hard drives with dual actuators Wols Lists
2024-11-14 11:21 ` Michael
2024-11-14 17:00 ` Dale
2024-11-14 19:12 ` Michael
2024-11-14 19:51 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2024-11-14 19:55 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2024-11-14 23:14 ` Peter Humphrey
2024-11-14 20:33 ` Dale
2024-11-14 20:57 ` Rich Freeman
2024-11-14 23:10 ` Dale
2024-11-15 0:59 ` Rich Freeman
2024-11-15 5:53 ` Dale
2024-11-15 10:09 ` Michael
2024-11-15 11:59 ` Dale
2024-11-15 15:35 ` Michael
2024-11-15 16:36 ` Dale
2024-11-15 22:13 ` Rich Freeman
2024-11-16 11:02 ` Michael
2024-11-16 14:36 ` Rich Freeman
2024-11-16 19:47 ` Michael
2024-11-16 20:13 ` Rich Freeman
2024-11-16 23:21 ` Wol
2024-11-17 11:22 ` Michael
2024-11-17 21:26 ` Rich Freeman
2024-11-17 23:04 ` Jack [this message]
2024-11-18 0:23 ` Rich Freeman
2024-11-18 2:32 ` Matt Jolly
2024-11-15 10:38 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2024-11-15 12:19 ` Dale
2024-11-14 22:38 ` Wols Lists
2024-11-15 9:35 ` Michael
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VL43KSZM.WX4TAYHL.UQDT6CU2@3A7PDRNJ.4JWAS2OM.UYQRY47Q \
--to=ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox