From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F933158042 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E50E4E0866; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from msi.no.swordarmor.fr (msi.no.swordarmor.fr [IPv6:2a0e:f42::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88DA4E0855 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from irc-clt.no.swordarmor.fr (irc-clt.no.as208627.net [IPv6:2a0e:f42:a::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by msi.no.swordarmor.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63789380A67 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 14:48:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=swordarmor.fr; s=msi; t=1729169314; bh=EZ8Bj3EZ/sK3eNiguYKupm3354LxUK0rH5mNeux4MGI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ByAw+uPT5UyEexkPwmmU28WU649qhrIL7zJDaND1IpuDwj2QrLCkMjhAIYBNr+xvE PECKbObBWDFx5vBNdP0jnQVe1Ajji5tIlnqDz8E7ofBvWu6OKaouQT6xtIe/AJS7wk HU0n03VkWkY9G+pdy3hXLgcX/YlY17GhpwNsM4Ck= Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 14:48:33 +0200 From: Alarig Le Lay To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: bird/frr routing Message-ID: References: <64f7918d-6d10-4c46-a0f8-1102cea67193@kenworthy.id.au> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <64f7918d-6d10-4c46-a0f8-1102cea67193@kenworthy.id.au> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 63789380A67 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.10 / 15.00]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_WHITELIST(0.00)[2a0e:f42:a::3]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:208627, ipnet:2a0e:f42::/32, country:FR] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: msi.no.swordarmor.fr X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=multimap; Matched map: IP_WHITELIST X-Archives-Salt: e1d3165d-e2d7-464c-9e72-0eae86299209 X-Archives-Hash: f98e0a4697fc8a68ae0a2dff547f3fe5 Hi, On Thu 17 Oct 2024 07:15:34 GMT, William Kenworthy wrote: > Hi, I have decided to give bird a go to replace frr (ospf) on my > network.  I am frustrated with frr and the latest update is giving me > weird problems (again). > > Is bird relatively stable (breaking updates are rare) and are there any > "gotchas" in using with vlans/wifi/vpn's.  My first test install > connected to frr first time and seems much simpler and easier to configure! > > BillK Out of curiosity, what are the issues you’re facing with frr? And yes, I have a big preference on bird vs. frr, particularly memory and perf wise. -- Alarig