From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DF94158083 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 22:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9A012BC01D; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 22:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hosts.co.uk (smtp.hosts.co.uk [85.233.160.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F382BC016 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 22:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host81-136-75-24.range81-136.btcentralplus.com ([81.136.75.24] helo=[192.168.1.99]) by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1sn4EV-00000000BDq-3jMY for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 23:48:44 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 23:48:43 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Package compile failures with "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault". To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <8c26be16-d033-ea3f-06e1-a9ce84cbbafb@gmail.com> <7866172.lvqk35OSZv@rogueboard> Content-Language: en-GB From: Wols Lists In-Reply-To: <7866172.lvqk35OSZv@rogueboard> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1a039340-9b61-4af4-b600-c1a8a3ecf74f X-Archives-Hash: d393390bc2480bc2429ba5beb6e3f328 On 05/09/2024 23:06, Michael wrote: > There is also dm-verity for a more involved solution. I think for Dale > something like this should work: Snag is, I think dm-verity (or do you actually mean dm-integrity, which is what I use) merely checks that what you read from disk is what you wrote to disk. If the ram corrupted it before it was written, I don't think either of them will detect it. Cheers, Wol