From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 970FE158042 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87774E0844; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:41:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:1e9::8849]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3887CE0821 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:41:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Contact-TNet-Consulting-Abuse-for-assistance by tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id 4A5NfQp3029776 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 17:41:26 -0600 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 17:41:26 -0600 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Getting tar to keep going Content-Language: en-US To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <2962590.e9J7NaK4W3@cube> From: Grant Taylor In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 0f445943-598b-4997-a624-1f26aa42d2a3 X-Archives-Hash: befbf54de6634541ade18b0a8f112211 On 11/5/24 10:27 AM, Grant Taylor wrote: > What?!?!?!  Network Manager can't be made to keep it's hands off of > /etc/resolv.conf so the workaround is to leverage file system features > to break Network Manager's hands when it tries to touch the file? Clarifying, after some replies that I've seen. I was surprised by, and doubted, the idea that Network Manager might not be able to be configured to leave /etc/resolv.conf alone. I assumed that Network Manager can be configured to leave /etc/resolv.conf alone. As such, I'd think it is better to configure Network Manager to leave /etc/resolv.conf alone and not fall back to something like setting the immutable attribute on the file to prevent it being messed with. -- Grant. . . .