Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] openrc 0.9.4 : opaque warnings
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:56:05
Message-Id: CAA2qdGUtUeAE5t6wcXwQ0UZKuM66J1ynmjajqLH0Z_qkF8k1Hg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] openrc 0.9.4 : opaque warnings by Neil Bothwick
1 On Nov 29, 2011 8:51 AM, "Neil Bothwick" <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
2 >
3 > On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:35:02 -0600, Dale wrote:
4 >
5 > > > I update regularly and just got the same message. I wonder why
6 > > > didn't the dev create a symlink from the /etc/conf.d/net.example
7 > > > -> /usr/share/doc/openrc- <latest_version>/net.example to save a
8 > > > need for the enotice?
9 >
10 > Because that would mean removing the existing file, which is in a
11 > CONFIG_PROTECTed directory.
12 >
13
14 Makes sense.
15
16 > > I used to symlink mine myself but when it changes versions, the link
17 > > breaks. Now I just use equery f to find the dang thing. I do wish
18 > > they would put net.example where the net file goes. Lots easier to
19 > > find.
20 >
21 > Set DOC_SYMLINKS_DIR in make.conf to save having to chase documentation
22 > when version numbers change.
23 >
24
25 Ahhhh... never knew that before...
26
27 *scurries to set said setting
28
29 Rgds,

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] openrc 0.9.4 : opaque warnings Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>