1 |
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
2 |
> Am Samstag, 10. November 2012, 23:46:52 schrieb Dale: |
3 |
>> Pandu Poluan wrote: |
4 |
>>> Oh, we like digressions :-) |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> I recall that sometimes last year, Tom's Hardware tested running a |
7 |
>>> system without heat sink... but completely immersed in... cooking oil! |
8 |
>>> They made a large acrylic container, poured in gallons of high-quality |
9 |
>>> cooking oil, then proceeded to overclock the CPU and GPU to unholy |
10 |
>>> frequencies... |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> And, IIRC, Seymour Cray likes to use some inert fluoride-based coolant |
13 |
>>> to dunk the components of his supercomputer machines. And he would |
14 |
>>> even go to lengths to design a "coolant fountain" that's not only |
15 |
>>> functional, but also decorative. |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>>>> The only caveat, is to get a cooling system, that is made of robust, |
18 |
>>> quality |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>>>> components. Also, monitoring the temperature is important, and it'd be |
21 |
>>>> nice to have a micro pressure transmitter, downstream of the pumping |
22 |
>>> mechanism |
23 |
>>> |
24 |
>>>> to ensure no leaks by detecting tiny leaks BEFORE they happen (delta-P). |
25 |
>>> That's the only qualms I have Re: water-coolant. I always an afraid of |
26 |
>>> leaks. So, I always wimped out and use the thermal wick kind of |
27 |
>>> almost, but not quite, somewhat similar to liquid coolant ;-) |
28 |
>>> |
29 |
>>> Rgds, |
30 |
>>> -- |
31 |
>> I seen on a show once that they use mineral oil when they put those |
32 |
>> robots in deep water. You know, the ones that are remote controlled and |
33 |
>> go VERY VERY deep. Anyway, they put mineral oil in it because it is not |
34 |
>> conductive, transmits heat pretty well and it doesn't let the water |
35 |
>> pressure crush the little robot. It can't crush it since it is full of |
36 |
>> a liquid already. |
37 |
>> |
38 |
>> If that is true, why not use mineral oil instead of water? I understand |
39 |
>> that could mean a change in hoses and such but still, if they can make |
40 |
>> hoses that can stand up to gas and other really nasty stuff then why not |
41 |
>> mineral oil too? At least with that, if you get a leak it won't burn |
42 |
>> out your mobo or whatever else it gets on. It would be messy tho. o_O |
43 |
>> |
44 |
>> Dale |
45 |
>> |
46 |
>> :-) :-) |
47 |
> lets see.. toxic, expensive, has to be recycled... |
48 |
> |
49 |
> vs |
50 |
> |
51 |
> water... |
52 |
> |
53 |
> also, submerging mobos in cooking oil is nothing new nor special. It smells |
54 |
> horrible after a while and any change is fucking time consuming (and dirty). |
55 |
> |
56 |
|
57 |
I didn't say to use cooking oil, I said to use mineral oil. Also, how |
58 |
is mineral oil toxic? Baby oil is mineral oil. I have psoriasis and I |
59 |
put on baby oil at least once a day, sometimes several times a day. If |
60 |
it is so toxic, why would people be putting it on babies? Heck, if it |
61 |
is so toxic, why am I still alive? How can cooking oil be toxic |
62 |
either? I cook with cooking oil and then eat the food I cook with it. |
63 |
It may be something but hardly toxic. |
64 |
|
65 |
Let's see, baby oil, not toxic, doesn't short out and blow up stuff when |
66 |
it leaks. Water, one leak and you could have to buy a new rig. Cost of |
67 |
mineral oil versus a new rig. I don't think that is even close. lol |
68 |
Also, it doesn't have to be a "new" idea to work. |
69 |
|
70 |
Just thought it worth a mention. |
71 |
|
72 |
Dale |
73 |
|
74 |
:-) :-) |
75 |
|
76 |
-- |
77 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |