Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: new system hardware
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:37:14
Message-Id: 509FC5C7.4000601@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: new system hardware by Volker Armin Hemmann
1 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
2 > Am Samstag, 10. November 2012, 23:46:52 schrieb Dale:
3 >> Pandu Poluan wrote:
4 >>> Oh, we like digressions :-)
5 >>>
6 >>> I recall that sometimes last year, Tom's Hardware tested running a
7 >>> system without heat sink... but completely immersed in... cooking oil!
8 >>> They made a large acrylic container, poured in gallons of high-quality
9 >>> cooking oil, then proceeded to overclock the CPU and GPU to unholy
10 >>> frequencies...
11 >>>
12 >>> And, IIRC, Seymour Cray likes to use some inert fluoride-based coolant
13 >>> to dunk the components of his supercomputer machines. And he would
14 >>> even go to lengths to design a "coolant fountain" that's not only
15 >>> functional, but also decorative.
16 >>>
17 >>>> The only caveat, is to get a cooling system, that is made of robust,
18 >>> quality
19 >>>
20 >>>> components. Also, monitoring the temperature is important, and it'd be
21 >>>> nice to have a micro pressure transmitter, downstream of the pumping
22 >>> mechanism
23 >>>
24 >>>> to ensure no leaks by detecting tiny leaks BEFORE they happen (delta-P).
25 >>> That's the only qualms I have Re: water-coolant. I always an afraid of
26 >>> leaks. So, I always wimped out and use the thermal wick kind of
27 >>> almost, but not quite, somewhat similar to liquid coolant ;-)
28 >>>
29 >>> Rgds,
30 >>> --
31 >> I seen on a show once that they use mineral oil when they put those
32 >> robots in deep water. You know, the ones that are remote controlled and
33 >> go VERY VERY deep. Anyway, they put mineral oil in it because it is not
34 >> conductive, transmits heat pretty well and it doesn't let the water
35 >> pressure crush the little robot. It can't crush it since it is full of
36 >> a liquid already.
37 >>
38 >> If that is true, why not use mineral oil instead of water? I understand
39 >> that could mean a change in hoses and such but still, if they can make
40 >> hoses that can stand up to gas and other really nasty stuff then why not
41 >> mineral oil too? At least with that, if you get a leak it won't burn
42 >> out your mobo or whatever else it gets on. It would be messy tho. o_O
43 >>
44 >> Dale
45 >>
46 >> :-) :-)
47 > lets see.. toxic, expensive, has to be recycled...
48 >
49 > vs
50 >
51 > water...
52 >
53 > also, submerging mobos in cooking oil is nothing new nor special. It smells
54 > horrible after a while and any change is fucking time consuming (and dirty).
55 >
56
57 I didn't say to use cooking oil, I said to use mineral oil. Also, how
58 is mineral oil toxic? Baby oil is mineral oil. I have psoriasis and I
59 put on baby oil at least once a day, sometimes several times a day. If
60 it is so toxic, why would people be putting it on babies? Heck, if it
61 is so toxic, why am I still alive? How can cooking oil be toxic
62 either? I cook with cooking oil and then eat the food I cook with it.
63 It may be something but hardly toxic.
64
65 Let's see, baby oil, not toxic, doesn't short out and blow up stuff when
66 it leaks. Water, one leak and you could have to buy a new rig. Cost of
67 mineral oil versus a new rig. I don't think that is even close. lol
68 Also, it doesn't have to be a "new" idea to work.
69
70 Just thought it worth a mention.
71
72 Dale
73
74 :-) :-)
75
76 --
77 I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: new system hardware Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: new system hardware Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de>