1 |
On Wednesday 10 May 2017 15:54:05 Ian Zimmerman wrote: |
2 |
> Since about 2 weekly updates ago (which seems to neatly translate to a |
3 |
> newly stable 2.3.10-r1 version of gkrellm) sometimes it starts without |
4 |
> any of the hardware monitoring sensors displayed. Not always; but since |
5 |
> gkrellm despite of all its other virtues is the misguided sort of |
6 |
> program that confuse configuration and state, and save the state when |
7 |
> exiting, this means once it happens I have to manually configure all the |
8 |
> sensors again, with the GUI because I don't know another way. ARGH! |
9 |
> |
10 |
> _All_ the hw monitoring sensors disappear: temps, fans, and voltages, |
11 |
> provided by at least two different hardware interfaces. This makes me |
12 |
> doubt that the cause is some change in the kernel or udev or anything on |
13 |
> that level - it looks more like a bug in gkrellm itself. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> (For complete clarity: I use the direct way to read sensor values, not |
16 |
> via mbmon or lm-sensors.) |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Has anyone else seen this? There was a thread discussing gkrellm not so |
19 |
> long ago, so I know there are other users around. |
20 |
|
21 |
No, it's fine here, and I also don't use lm_sensors. I only show temperatures |
22 |
though. I'd show you a screen shot, but it's 1.3MB. |
23 |
|
24 |
Gkrellm is just about the most useful accessory for the Linux desktop, if |
25 |
you ask me. I have three instances of it here, showing data from three |
26 |
machines. |
27 |
|
28 |
If you want to report a bug, the place to do it is on the mailing list |
29 |
gkrellm@××××××××××××××××××××××.com . |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Regards |
33 |
Peter |