| 1 |
On 03/07/2017 01:47 PM, David W Noon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:19:33 -0700, thelma@×××××××××××.com |
| 3 |
> (thelma@×××××××××××.com) wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Helvetica fonts: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> [snip] |
| 6 |
>> fc-list | egrep 'Helvetica' | sort |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> This last one should give you what you need: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> /usr/share/fonts/Helvetica/Helvetica.pfa:Helvetica:style=Regular |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>> The display far from samples fonts on wiki :-/ |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Sorry, was typing fast. I mean to say the display fonts via flpsed are |
| 15 |
not what is shown on wiki pages. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I don't understand the above sentence. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
It seems to me the problem is the creator of the pdf document (on my |
| 21 |
system): pdfTeX-1.40.16 or cairo 1.9.5 |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Viewing these document via evnce, gv, gimp etc it show normal, nice |
| 24 |
fonts; but when I open (same document) locally created via "flpsed" the |
| 25 |
fonts are very rough. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
When I try to open any other PDF file via "flpsed", not created by me, |
| 28 |
the fonts are nice looking. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
So, maybe I'm looking in a wrong place. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Here what is on my system: |
| 33 |
qlist -C -I texlive |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
app-text/texlive |
| 36 |
app-text/texlive-core |
| 37 |
dev-texlive/texlive-basic |
| 38 |
dev-texlive/texlive-fontsrecommended |
| 39 |
dev-texlive/texlive-fontutils |
| 40 |
dev-texlive/texlive-genericrecommended |
| 41 |
dev-texlive/texlive-htmlxml |
| 42 |
dev-texlive/texlive-langenglish |
| 43 |
dev-texlive/texlive-latex |
| 44 |
dev-texlive/texlive-latexrecommended |
| 45 |
dev-texlive/texlive-metapost |
| 46 |
dev-texlive/texlive-pictures |
| 47 |
dev-texlive/texlive-texinfo |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
Maybe I'm missing something. |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-- |
| 52 |
Thelma |
Archives