1 |
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:21:53 +0100, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
> On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:09:23 +0200, Jesús Guerrero wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> The USE flag idea is non-viable and doesn't make sense. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Why not? The flag already exists for the very purpose the OP raised. |
8 |
|
9 |
Oh, you meant "vanilla", sorry, I was talking about the other idea that I |
10 |
read on I don't know which mail before about USE flags to set different |
11 |
editors, which is not viable at all. |
12 |
|
13 |
I'd have nothing against the "vanilla" flag, but surely everyone will want |
14 |
a flag for their preferred editor. Using a var in make.conf is absolutely |
15 |
better in my opinion, but as said, this is non-trivial. Portage would need |
16 |
to adjust the dependencies, it's not as easy as to throw a random string |
17 |
into the ebuild. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Jesús Guerrero |