| 1 |
On 18 August 2010 21:37, Bill Longman <bill.longman@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 08/18/2010 11:03 AM, Nganon wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Clear now, thanks. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > If you want a robust filesystem, look into ZFS/BTRFS. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > AFAIK ZFS is unmaintained and BTRFS is not stable, am I wrong? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Not really. ZFS is only available on Solaris right now. I seem to |
| 13 |
> remember it was running on one of the BSD's, too, since it's a matter of |
| 14 |
> licensing that is the hurdle of greatest height. I've only played with |
| 15 |
> BTRFS on my dev box and the simple workout I gave it did not tax it in |
| 16 |
> any way--it worked okay. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
Right, remembered after reading the 'licensing', it was only available |
| 20 |
through FUSE. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I just checked on BTRFS. wiki.kernel.org says BTRFS is stable as of 2.6.29 |
| 23 |
but still |
| 24 |
masked on Gentoo. I will read more about it later and decide whether to |
| 25 |
convert. |
Archives