| 1 |
walt wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 09/29/2010 03:40 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Hi all users, |
| 4 |
>> we hope to be able to provide a better experience for all of you at |
| 5 |
>> the end of this (bumpy) journey. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Thanks! |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> On behalf of the Geriatric Gentoo Users Group I say, "No, please, |
| 10 |
> allow us to |
| 11 |
> thank YOU for all the great work you do for gentoo!" |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Maintaining high quality is always an uphill battle, and those of us |
| 14 |
> in the GGUG |
| 15 |
> know and appreciate how much work you do on our behalf. So, once |
| 16 |
> again, thanks |
| 17 |
> from the old farts! |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Alan, Volker, Dale -- anything to add? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
+1 If I could reproduce, I would say +2. Alas there is only one of |
| 23 |
me. Stop clapping and jumping up and down in your seat. ;-) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
As least we know this is coming. I just wonder why there wasn't |
| 26 |
something added to portage to fix this? Maybe that wasn't doable. If a |
| 27 |
person was to download a new stage3 and do a fresh install, would that |
| 28 |
put a end to this problem? In other words, does this affect new |
| 29 |
installs the same as old installs? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Dale |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
:-) :-) |
Archives