| 1 |
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 2 |
>> How on earth do you justify that statement? |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> AMD Athlon64 X2 EE 6000+ 129¤ (boxed) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Intel® Core 2 Duo E6850 234¤ |
| 9 |
> Intel® Core 2 Duo E4700 134¤ (not boxed). |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
There is no equivalence there in terms of actual processing power. The |
| 13 |
best buy on the market for "bang per buck" is the Intel Q6600. Also, |
| 14 |
whilst nominally a 2.4 GHz chip, it runs happily at 3.0 GHz with the |
| 15 |
standard cooler - some examples even faster. ;) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
From Overclockers.co.uk: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Intel Core 2 Quad Pro Q6600 "Energy Efficient SLACR 95W Edition" |
| 20 |
> 2.40GHz (1066FSB) - OEM |
| 21 |
> <http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=CP-172-IN&groupid=701&catid=6&subcat=> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Quad Core Technology, 2.40GHz clock speed, 8MB L2 Cache, Intel |
| 24 |
> Speedstep Technology, EM64T 64-Bit Technology, Execute Disable Bit, |
| 25 |
> Energy Efficient Version, 1yr Warranty. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Average rating of 5.0 |
| 28 |
> <http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=CP-172-IN&tool=3&groupid=701&catid=6&subcat=> |
| 29 |
> Intel 10+ in stock £123.99 |
| 30 |
> (£145.69) |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Be lucky, |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Neil |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
This message has been scanned for viruses and |
| 43 |
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is |
| 44 |
believed to be clean. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives