Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nitin Kanaskar <nitinvk04@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gentoo older versions
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 00:50:41
Message-Id: e318a6a80905071750o2945e763w6d4f77ec5e7c0acc@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gentoo older versions by Mark Shields
1 I may need more time for doing this -
2 currently for time constraint i have switched
3 over to some other distro.
4 Thanks for the info Mark.
5
6 On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Mark Shields <laebshade@×××××.com> wrote:
7 > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:23 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
8 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
9 >> Hash: SHA1
10 >>
11 >> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:14:45AM -0700, Nitin Kanaskar wrote:
12 >>> Ok - I am not clear about the terminology -
13 >>> packages, versions...
14 >>> But i need to install gentoo 2004/2005 - if this
15 >>> is right. I am a graduate student doing research on
16 >>> vulnerabilities, exploits and IDS. Hence I am looking
17 >>> for older gentoo installations which i know have
18 >>> some vulnerabilities.
19 >>> If i have to build whole OS from source, I am willing
20 >>> to do that - but could not find any resource on that
21 >>> old stuff.
22 >>
23 >> Gentoo, as a distribution, is versionless.  The 2004/2005 you are
24 >> referring to are versions of our release media.  What you would have to
25 >> do is find out which packages and which versions of the packages you
26 >> want to work with and see if we still have them in the tree.
27 >>
28 >> William
29 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 >> Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
31 >>
32 >> iEYEARECAAYFAkn8gawACgkQblQW9DDEZThqXwCgs9ZSKvDZbRgd9bzmDxe9wA36
33 >> ccUAoIrd1uKpHzEvlRXRbBEzearyYKYS
34 >> =cPF9
35 >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
36 >>
37 >>
38 >
39 > That isn't entirely accurate.  If you can get a livecd, or a minimal
40 > cd + package cd (distfiles), and just not upgrade portage, he would be
41 > able to use it fine.
42 >
43 > --
44 > - Mark Shields
45 >
46 >