| 1 |
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:00:03 -0500 |
| 2 |
Dale <dalek1967@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 4 |
<SNIP> |
| 5 |
> This ISP search is crap. They all say unlimited then limit it in |
| 6 |
> the fine print. That sucks. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Dale |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> :-) :-) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Heh, I actually had the opposite situation w/ my DSL ISP: a large |
| 15 |
part of my originally choosing them was because their data transfer |
| 16 |
limits were easy to find & very reasonable. And since then I've |
| 17 |
repeatedly seen the techs on their IRC server say that they haven't |
| 18 |
enforced the limits for years. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
My experience w/ them has only been on DSL, not dial-up, and they're |
| 21 |
a fairly small local ISP so they may not be available where you are, |
| 22 |
but I have a very good opinion of XMission (although sadly they did |
| 23 |
discontinue their Gentoo mirror some time ago). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Pricing: <http://www.xmission.com/about/pricing/#dialup> |
| 26 |
Phone Numbers: <http://www.xmission.com/about/dialup/> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Good luck, |
| 30 |
Conway S. Smith |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all |
| 33 |
learned. (Bruce Ediger, bediger@××××××××.org, in comp.os.linux.misc, |
| 34 |
on X interfaces.) |
Archives