1 |
> Therefore Ext2 is a perfect match: |
2 |
> * it is so old, that I guess by now most bugs have been found and squashed; |
3 |
> * it is so old, that virtually any Linux (or Windows, FreeBSD, or |
4 |
> most other knows OS's) are able to at least read it; |
5 |
> * it is so old, that by now I bet there are countless recovery tools; |
6 |
> * it is so simple (compared with others), that someone could just |
7 |
> re-implement a reader for it, or recovery tools; |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Any feedback about the Ext2 for backups? (Hope I'm not wrong on this one...) |
10 |
|
11 |
Unexpectedly ext4 is actually rather good for embedded when compared to |
12 |
JFS etc.. |
13 |
|
14 |
However I have been considering using ext2 on my home partitions |
15 |
for the very reason you guess upon (it is easily recoverable by |
16 |
testdisk rather than carving out inodes, in fact ext4 was known to have |
17 |
this issue but traded it for other benefits when it was designed). I |
18 |
will have to look into the performance differences but thinking about |
19 |
it now as my IO is usually net or usb then I can't see it being |
20 |
relevant. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
_______________________________________________________________________ |
25 |
|
26 |
'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work |
27 |
together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a |
28 |
universal interface' |
29 |
|
30 |
(Doug McIlroy) |
31 |
_______________________________________________________________________ |