| 1 |
On 2013-01-31, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Jan 31, 2013 5:38 PM, "Nuno Silva" <nunojsilva@×××××××.pt> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>>> Also, I suppose that, if there were library incompatibilities, the |
| 6 |
>>> package would never go stable, or would at least, like Yohan said, lead |
| 7 |
>>> to a block/version dependency. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Well, many times you can't really anticipate everything. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I had my libreoffice-bin pdf import broken for two months because some |
| 12 |
> shared library had got upgraded against which it wasn't linked. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I guess that sometimes this kind of issues may be harder to spot, or |
| 15 |
require harder fixes (see for example the current state of LISP where |
| 16 |
some packages require ASDF 2 but the stable one is ASDF 1, AFAIK the |
| 17 |
stabilization of ASDF 2 is pending because some eclasses have to be |
| 18 |
changed), but even then I'd suppose this is what the unstable arches are |
| 19 |
for. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Nuno Silva (aka njsg) |
| 23 |
http://njsg.sdf-eu.org/ |
Archives