Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mrugesh Karnik <mrugeshkarnik@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:50:58
Message-Id: 200611280711.46325.mrugeshkarnik@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0 by Richard Fish
1 On Tuesday 28 November 2006 06:38, Richard Fish wrote:
2 > On 11/27/06, Mrugesh Karnik <mrugeshkarnik@×××××.com> wrote:
3 > > udevd-event[3110]: rename_netif: error changing net interface name
4 > > eth0_rename to eth1: No such device.
5 >
6 > Hmm, haven't seen this error, but these rules (based on
7 > 70-persistent-net.rules) might work better:
8 >
9 > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ATTRS{address}=="00:13:d3:60:4a:a5", NAME="eth0"
10 > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ATTRS{address}=="00:0d:88:45:c1:c9", NAME="eth1"
11
12 Stupid question perhaps.. but does it matter in which files the rules go? I
13 can see a 75-persistent-net-generator.rules file in there..
14
15 > > /me thinks about setting RC_DEVICE_TARBALL="yes"
16 >
17 > This won't help for ethernet naming. There is no /dev/eth* device
18 > node, after all.
19
20 True. Hmm.
21 --
22 ----------------------------------------
23 Mrugesh Karnik
24 GPG Key 0xBA6F1DA8
25 Public key on http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
26 ----------------------------------------
27 --
28 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0 Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org>