1 |
* Ralph Slooten <axllent@×××××.com> [2006-06-18 12:52]: |
2 |
> Today I expended my RAM to 2GB (DDR) to my workstation, as apposed to |
3 |
> the initial 1GB I had. The RAm added is identical to the initial RAM. |
4 |
> Without changing the kernel (2.6.16.x) I still get 1GB available, and |
5 |
> digging into the kernel I found the section regarding the High Memory |
6 |
> Support and Memory split. |
7 |
|
8 |
Note that without doing *anything*, with a normal 3G/1G split, you'll |
9 |
actually get 896M. Recent kernels added in a config option to have a |
10 |
2.75G/1.25G split, which solves this problem; it makes sense to use that |
11 |
if you have 1G of RAM. |
12 |
|
13 |
> I did a bit of googeling, the first page I found (old) said to turn on |
14 |
> High Memory Support, however a more recent page |
15 |
> (http://linux-vserver.org/Step-by-Step+Guide+2.6) states to leave it off |
16 |
> and just change the split to 2/2 to make full use of 2GB of RAM. |
17 |
|
18 |
My understanding is that the performance hit from enabling high memory |
19 |
support is actually fairly small; if you have more than 1G (where the |
20 |
fix is unlikely to break anything) it's not worth worrying about. |
21 |
|
22 |
> I tried both ways, but either way I get poor 3D performance from UT2004 |
23 |
> when I have this extra memory in. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> (snip) |
26 |
> |
27 |
> however UT2004 still sucks when playing (sluggish and screen jolts |
28 |
> from time to time like I have too little RAM). |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Any ideas? |
31 |
|
32 |
My guesses is, as has already been suggested, that something is messed |
33 |
up with your video driver. Did you recompile it when you recompile your |
34 |
kernel? Is acceleration still working at all? Do you get the current |
35 |
performance issues either without the extra RAM with a highmem kernel or |
36 |
with the extra RAM without a highmem or 2G/2G kernel? |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
David Klempner |