| 1 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 06:45:16 -0400, covici@××××××××××.com wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > > The only thing you gain is being able to run 32-bit applications |
| 6 |
> > > against those libraries, even if you don't have any need to. The only |
| 7 |
> > > thing you lose is a bunch of inodes, and maybe some compile time. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Well, that clarifies things a bit -- what is strange is that I had to do |
| 10 |
> > about 70 packages beffore portage would let the preserved-rebuild go |
| 11 |
> > through, for future reference is there an automatic way to add all the |
| 12 |
> > use flags, even the packages which already have other use flags? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> The --autounmask option for emerge does that (you still have to confirm |
| 15 |
> the changes with etc-update). This is enabled by default, so it appears |
| 16 |
> you have disabled it in make.conf if you are not already seeing the offer |
| 17 |
> to add the packages. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Yep, I disabled it -- I didn't know autounmask included use flags as |
| 20 |
well -- thanks for that. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
| 24 |
How do |
| 25 |
you spend it? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
John Covici |
| 28 |
covici@××××××××××.com |
Archives