| 1 |
Mike Edenfield wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 7/6/2009 2:23 PM, Jarry wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> -I/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2-r3/work/gcc-4.3.2/gcc/../libdecnu |
| 5 |
>> mber/bid -I../libdecnumber insn-recog.c -o insn-recog.o |
| 6 |
>> {standard input}: Assembler messages: |
| 7 |
>> {standard input}:36051: Warning: end of file not at end of a line; |
| 8 |
>> newline inserted |
| 9 |
>> {standard input}:37071: Error: bad register name `%e' |
| 10 |
>> xgcc: Internal error: Killed (program cc1) |
| 11 |
>> Please submit a full bug report. |
| 12 |
>> See <http://bugs.gentoo.org/> for instructions. |
| 13 |
>> make[3]: *** [insn-attrtab.o] Error 1 |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>> MAKEOPTS="-j2" |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Can you try this again without -j2 in the make opts? The gcc build |
| 18 |
> process is enough of a pain to debug when you can see output |
| 19 |
> sequentially, running parallel makes makes it worse. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> In your case, it failed trying to assemble insn-attrtab.o but the last |
| 22 |
> output on screen was from insn-recog.c on a different make branch. It |
| 23 |
> appears that the build process generated an incomplete insn-attrtab.c |
| 24 |
> file which cut off in the middle of an opcode, most likely in the middle |
| 25 |
> of a register name like %eax. Its possible that there was another error |
| 26 |
> buried up further in the output that got lost in the parallelizing. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Now this is strange: I commented out that MAKEOPTS="-j2" in make.conf |
| 29 |
and gcc compilled without any complaint. I did not change anything |
| 30 |
else! Can't believe this. I will check it tomorrow again, with -j2 |
| 31 |
and without... |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Jarry |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
_______________________________________________________________ |
| 37 |
This mailbox accepts e-mails only from selected mailing-lists! |
| 38 |
Everything else is considered to be spam and therefore deleted. |
Archives