| 1 |
On 05/06/14 14:39, Dutch Ingraham wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 06/04/2014 08:02 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Gentoo doesn't have write access to ::mate-overlay, it's completely |
| 4 |
>> unofficial |
| 5 |
>> Gentoo developers are just as much users as you are for ::mate-overlay |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Enough said |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> - Samuli |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> Sorry, but this isn't just a MATE overlay problem. Once I made your |
| 13 |
> suggested changes, the MATE "mask change" requests disappeared. What I |
| 14 |
> did get was XFCE mask requirements: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> [snip] |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> The following mask changes are necessary to proceed: |
| 19 |
> (see "package.unmask" in the portage(5) man page for more details) |
| 20 |
> # required by xfce-base/xfce4-meta-4.10 |
| 21 |
> # required by @selected |
| 22 |
> # required by @world (argument) |
| 23 |
> # /etc/portage/package.mask: |
| 24 |
> # problems with systemd, upower shift to upower.pm.utils |
| 25 |
> =xfce-base/xfce4-session-4.10.1-r1 |
| 26 |
> # required by virtual/udev-208-r2 |
| 27 |
> # required by sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3 |
| 28 |
> # required by xfce-base/xfce4-session-4.10.1-r1[udev] |
| 29 |
> # required by xfce-base/xfce4-meta-4.10 |
| 30 |
> # required by @selected |
| 31 |
> # required by @world (argument) |
| 32 |
> # /etc/portage/package.mask: |
| 33 |
> # problems with systemd, upower shift to upower.pm.utils |
| 34 |
> =sys-apps/systemd-212-r5 |
| 35 |
> # required by sys-apps/systemd-212-r5[-vanilla] |
| 36 |
> # required by sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3 |
| 37 |
> # required by xfce-base/xfce4-session-4.10.1-r1[udev] |
| 38 |
> # required by xfce-base/xfce4-meta-4.10 |
| 39 |
> # required by @selected |
| 40 |
> # required by @world (argument) |
| 41 |
> # /etc/portage/package.mask: |
| 42 |
> # problems with systemd, upower shift to upower.pm.utils |
| 43 |
> =sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration-4 |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> [snip] |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
> I had already <emerge - C>'d those two XFCE applications because, early |
| 48 |
> in this process an <equery depends upower> had shown them to be |
| 49 |
> dependent upon "upower" even after emerging "upower-pm-utils." I have |
| 50 |
> no confidence at this point that my particular problem is reasonably |
| 51 |
> solvable, as I have been caught in this circle for three days now. |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
There is no need to mask any Xfce packages, in fact, masking them would |
| 55 |
cause more blockers. |
| 56 |
So that output would be bogus, as it would include the wrong Xfce masks, |
| 57 |
and futhermore it's only end of |
| 58 |
the output, so it wouldn't tell the necessary information required for |
| 59 |
solving it anyway. |
| 60 |
Remove anykind of Xfce masks and post complete output, and don't forget |
| 61 |
to use the --tree flag (-t) to see |
| 62 |
what is pulling in what. |
| 63 |
That is, if you still want help solving the issue. |
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
- Samuli |
Archives