| 1 |
On Fri, July 3, 2009 21:56, Sebastian Beßler wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jesús Guerrero schrieb: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> I really advice to stay in .28 if you are going to use fglrx. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> That is exactly what the ebuild says after building with a kernel >2.6.28 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> "Kernels newer then 2.6.28 are heavily patched and might result in |
| 12 |
> runtime failitures." "Consider them as unsupported by us." |
| 13 |
> "All bug reports are needed to be tested with 2.6.28 kernel" |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Besides your bleat here doesn't help at all. |
| 17 |
> Nobody here on the list has any power to change the way the |
| 18 |
> ati-developers release there drivers or which kernels are supported. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> If you always want to run the latest kernel a videocard from ati or |
| 21 |
> nvidia maybe isn't the right for you. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
True. But that's irrelevant to the thread, we are talking about |
| 24 |
fglrx here. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I was merely responding to a post that, to say the least, was full |
| 27 |
of inaccuracies (to say the least, I repeat). |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Or should I just shut up and let spread misinformation just to be |
| 30 |
decorous? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Regards. |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Jesús Guerrero |
Archives