| 1 |
Harry Putnam wrote: |
| 2 |
> James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Harry Putnam <reader <at> newsguy.com> writes: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes: |
| 8 |
>>>> lxde is deprecated, imho. [1] |
| 9 |
>>>> lxqt is the future of that lineage [2] |
| 10 |
>>> Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to |
| 11 |
>>> the question. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> OK, if that is true, who is answering your questions on lxde, which |
| 14 |
>> I am still using? I have lots of breakage on lxde; I do not bother |
| 15 |
>> fixing. I'm working on migrating to lxqt. Good luck with lxde. |
| 16 |
> For your information: Attached is message from the lxde devel gmane |
| 17 |
> group from Jonathan Thibault <jonathan@×××××××.com>. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> PS: I installed and tried out lxqt. I was not impressed. It appears |
| 20 |
> only about half ready for production. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
What was supposed to be attached again? ;-) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Dale |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
:-) :-) |
Archives