1 |
On Wednesday 27 May 2015 15:16:35 Peter Humphrey wrote: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 27 May 2015 09:21:37 Rich Freeman wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> wrote: |
6 |
> > > This is a KDE amd64 system with /usr under / and no initrd. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Just to clarify, is /usr on a separate filesystem, or the same as /? |
9 |
> > I don't think that is your problem in any case, but it might be |
10 |
> > relevant. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I didn't realise I wasn't clear, sorry. It might have been better if I'd |
13 |
> said usr/ is under /. Anyway, it's not a separate partition. |
14 |
|
15 |
It was clear to me. It did a double take after Canek's email and still |
16 |
arrived at the same conclusion, but I accept that others read it differently. |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
> > > ... bunch of KDE stuff |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > I've had the odd KDE issue along the way, like having extra panels |
22 |
> > spawning off-screen with notifications showing up in wierd places as a |
23 |
> > result. That doesn't sound like your specific problem, but assuming a |
24 |
> > KDE expert doesn't chime in here you might consider pursuing those |
25 |
> > questions in a KDE forum/list, or maybe even in the Gentoo forums |
26 |
> > where there is a section for desktop environments. Again, assuming |
27 |
> > somebody doesn't recognize your problem here. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Since writing, I've found that my fonts have all changed as well. It's |
30 |
> almost as though something were cruising my home directories and flipping |
31 |
> bits. And KMail insists on using American English in the composer, despite |
32 |
> my telling it UK. That may not be new though. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> I'm signed up to the KDE-Linux list already but I see hardly any traffic, |
35 |
> and I suspect dark things about what happens to posts of mine on it. |
36 |
|
37 |
Disclaimer: I am not using the full KDE desktop, but use a few KDE apps with |
38 |
an enlightenment desktop. |
39 |
|
40 |
In the last week or two I noticed an oddity with kdeinit4, which I haven't yet |
41 |
been able to explain. I share it here in case it is related to your problem, |
42 |
but even so my setup is different to yours and I have no explanation for it: |
43 |
|
44 |
When away from base using insecure WiFi I run 'proxychains kdeinit4' to tunnel |
45 |
back to a local machine at home and bounce off to the Internet from there. |
46 |
|
47 |
Suddenly, my (old) Kmail-1.13.7 stopped using the tunnel. My (new) |
48 |
Knode-4.4.11 is also not using the tunnel. They both just hang not |
49 |
establishing a connection whatsoever. Konsole-2.14.2 is not using the tunnel |
50 |
either. |
51 |
|
52 |
Strangely, Konqueror-4.14.3 *is* using the tunnel as before. Launching |
53 |
konsole directly with 'proxychains konsole' is using the tunnel. Kmail just |
54 |
fails to get anywhere even when invoked directly with proxychains, rather than |
55 |
via kdeinit4. |
56 |
|
57 |
Proxychains was updated a couple of weeks ago and this problem may be related |
58 |
to it (I've raised a bug just in case), or it may be that something changed in |
59 |
KDE and this is the cause of both of our problems? |
60 |
|
61 |
|
62 |
> > > The last thing is that at reboot the RAID-1 volume manager often fails |
63 |
> > > to start. It says afterwards that it's running, but all the /dev/vg7/* |
64 |
> > > are absent (that's where the logical volumes live). The file system |
65 |
> > > root lives on /dev/md5 with metadata < 1.0, while /dev/vg7 has |
66 |
> > > metadata >1.0. The fact that it happens often but not always suggests |
67 |
> > > a timing problem to me. |
68 |
> > |
69 |
> > I've sometimes seen this sort of thing with kernel raid autodetection, |
70 |
> > especially with metadata <1. |
71 |
> |
72 |
> More clarity needed on my part. The file-system root is /dev/md5 which has |
73 |
> metadata < 1.0. It's found reliably by kernel autodetection. Subsidiary |
74 |
> partitions are in /dev/md7 which has metadata > 1.0 and lvm2 volumes. |
75 |
> Here's a bit of fstab: |
76 |
> |
77 |
> /dev/vg7/portage /usr/portage ext4 relatime,discard 1 3 |
78 |
> /dev/vg7/packages /usr/portage/packages ext4 relatime,discard 1 2 |
79 |
> /dev/vg7/distfiles /usr/portage/distfiles ext4 relatime,discard 1 2 |
80 |
> /dev/vg7/local /usr/local ext4 relatime,discard 1 2 |
81 |
> |
82 |
> It's the detection of md7 that often fails; I've had no trouble with md5. |
83 |
> |
84 |
> Several other directories are in lvm2 volumes in /dev/vg7, but nothing |
85 |
> that's part of system. |
86 |
> |
87 |
> > I suspect that an initramfs might help |
88 |
> > you out, assuming the filesystems on that RAID are useful in early |
89 |
> > boot. However, openrc and the raid init scripts should do a good job |
90 |
> > of configuring your raid if your mdadm.conf and such is correct, so if |
91 |
> > you don't need those filesystems until late in boot I don't think an |
92 |
> > initramfs will make much of a difference, since it would likely use |
93 |
> > the exact same userspace tools as openrc already does. Make sure your |
94 |
> > mdadm.conf is set up to search all devices that could contain RAID |
95 |
> > (drive device names can get re-ordered), and it doesn't hurt to put |
96 |
> > ARRAY lines in mdadm.conf to give it hints. |
97 |
> |
98 |
> Like this? |
99 |
> ARRAY /dev/md1 devices=/dev/sda1,/dev/sdb1 |
100 |
> ARRAY /dev/md5 devices=/dev/sda5,/dev/sdb5 |
101 |
> ARRAY /dev/md7 devices=/dev/sda7,/dev/sdb7 |
102 |
|
103 |
No, I have always used something like: |
104 |
|
105 |
ARRAY /dev/md7 metadata=1.2 UUID=f9516418:7ef43875:4e922ca1:43796eb1 \ |
106 |
name=data_server:0 |
107 |
|
108 |
It may be that the /dev/sdaX takes longer to settle and this causes your |
109 |
problem, but I can't tell for sure. |
110 |
|
111 |
|
112 |
> I've just switched on a few more sensors in gkrellm, and I see Vcor2 at |
113 |
> 3.00 and +3.3v at 3.34. Is it worth fiddling with those and related |
114 |
> settings in the BIOS? I've always hesitated to do that, preferring to let |
115 |
> it sort itself out. |
116 |
|
117 |
If you haven't O/C'ed it, I'd leave it alone. However, if the voltage used to |
118 |
be something different in the past and is now registering a lower value using |
119 |
the same version BIOS firmware, then you could have a failing PSU. We all |
120 |
know that this will inevitably lead to behavioural problems (inc. waving your |
121 |
arms around and making noises ... :-)) |
122 |
|
123 |
-- |
124 |
Regards, |
125 |
Mick |