| 1 |
> |
| 2 |
> For me I need to know, whether it is safe to recompile gcc natively on |
| 3 |
> the beaglebone with lto support enabled via USE flag. |
| 4 |
> This compilation will take about eight hours. |
| 5 |
> So it would be fine to decide on a little bit more than try and error. ;) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Or how can I circumvent the described problems? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
There's not much risk to just try the recompile, since you can always |
| 11 |
revert to the gcc from the tarball, right? (or quickpkg) Or is it the 8 |
| 12 |
hours that you're concerned about? If so, sounds like an overnight job. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
When looking at this on my system I found that lto use flag was not in gcc |
| 15 |
- so i have broken my config at some stage. (im whilelisting packages for |
| 16 |
lto, not blacklisting, so the config is a little different). Rebuilding |
| 17 |
4.7.3 now to try it out. |
Archives