| 1 |
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:26:14 +0200 |
| 2 |
Holly Bostick <motub@××××××.nl> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Rudmer van Dijk schreef: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Holly: eix is probably not it, since it looks like it does not show the |
| 7 |
> > availability of the package (masked+keyword), but thanks for the suggestion! |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Rudmer |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Actually, it most certainly does; keyworded packages are shown in brown |
| 12 |
> with a ~ in front, masked packages are listed in red with a [M] in front. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Of course you can use what suits you best; just wanted to clear up the |
| 15 |
> misconception. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Holly |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I haven't seen anyone post this script as yet. It's by ciaranm and is |
| 20 |
very useful when people ask on irc why a certain package version can't |
| 21 |
be installed on their arch. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Sample output: |
| 24 |
tom@tom ~ 0 0.67 $ eshowkw |
| 25 |
gnome Keywords for gnome-base/gnome: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
| a a a h i m m p p p p s s s x x x x |
| 28 |
| l m r p a 6 i p p p p 3 h p 8 8 8 8 |
| 29 |
| p d m p 6 8 p c c c c 9 a 6 6 6 6 |
| 30 |
| h 6 a 4 k s 6 - - 0 r - - - |
| 31 |
| a 4 4 m o c f o o |
| 32 |
| a d b b d |
| 33 |
| c s s |
| 34 |
| o d d |
| 35 |
| s |
| 36 |
------------+------------------------------------ |
| 37 |
1.4-r3 | - + + |
| 38 |
2.8.2 | + + + + + + + + |
| 39 |
2.8.3-r1 | ~ + + + ~ + + + |
| 40 |
2.10 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ |
| 41 |
2.10-r1 | + + + ~ + ~ + + |
| 42 |
2.10.1_pre0 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Hope this is helpful to someone ;) |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
Tom Wesley <tom@×××××.org> |
Archives