| 1 |
On 09/12 04:50, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017, 05:43:59 CEST schrieb tuxic@××××××.de: |
| 3 |
> > Hi, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > got a problem this morning: |
| 6 |
> > >>> Verifying ebuild manifests |
| 7 |
> > >>> Running pre-merge checks for sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r4 |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > * Sanity check to keep you from breaking your system: |
| 10 |
> > * Downgrading glibc is not supported and a sure way to destruction |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> ... because I accidentally removed 2.24-r4 instead of 2.24-r3. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Got fixed a few hours later as soon as someone filed a bug. |
| 15 |
> (I wanted to keep the last 2.24 revision.) |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> --> so, file bugs! :) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> That said, 2.24 won't go stable; the current stable candidate is 2.25-r5. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> -- |
| 22 |
> Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 23 |
> dilfridge@g.o |
| 24 |
> Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Hi Andreas, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
...and it was also a configuration bug on my side (see my last |
| 30 |
posting). |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Do you know how to solve this long lasting texinfo problem on my side? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Cheers |
| 35 |
Meino |
Archives