1 |
You can't edit /etc/default/grub to customize how grub-mkconfig generates |
2 |
grub.cfg. Mint probably has update-grub like Ubuntu does which just allows |
3 |
you to use that command instead of grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg |
4 |
On Feb 14, 2012 2:55 PM, "LK" <linuxrocksrulers@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
> |
7 |
> On 120214, at 20:29, Andrea Conti wrote: |
8 |
> >> PS: If you know how to get rid of any background image, could you |
9 |
> >> say how? |
10 |
> > Remove or comment out any "splashimage" directives from the config file. |
11 |
> I meant in GRUB2. I have another box with linux mint using GRUB2, and |
12 |
> splash backgrounds in GRUB / lowlevel menus or anywhere ("branding") |
13 |
> reminds me of commercialism like Apple putting their logo onto every |
14 |
> product. (They are good, tho, the apple logo is stylish. Now imagine the |
15 |
> iPhone would have a rectangle-like icon with bad proportions) |
16 |
> |
17 |
> > Re grub2: as long as grub0 works, I really don't care if grub2 is |
18 |
> > better, cleaner, shinier, more modern or anything else. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > I don't need a freakin' whole OS to boot linux, and having a |
21 |
> > configuration that is so convoluted that it *has to* be generated by |
22 |
> > running a set of scripts makes no sense at all. I thought the days of m4 |
23 |
> > and sendmail.cf were over a long time ago... |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > I am sure grub2 can be made to work, but for a piece of software as |
26 |
> > vital as a boot loader, that level of complexity in my opinion is |
27 |
> > totally unreasonable and impossible to justify. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> I agree to you in a big part. Thanks. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Big companies like Microsoft or Apple are doing a thing i simply call |
32 |
> "Similarisation of features for new/unknowledged users", which always |
33 |
> goes in the reverse direction on long-term. Sample situation: Microsoft |
34 |
> Repair CD: You can select to partition your disk appropiate to how the |
35 |
> assistant will like it. You are being hid from all the details, as you wont |
36 |
> understand them any way. |
37 |
> Once you try to do something special, you get problems bigger than |
38 |
> without this 'improvement for new ones'. This is because less work is |
39 |
> being done to the detailed way of doing it, and more to the simple, |
40 |
> which is made to just do one or two things. |
41 |
> Essence: The system is hidden, you only see actions what you can |
42 |
> do (update-grub in our case) instead of the system. This is obviously |
43 |
> wrong because the system, the back-end, takes more than |
44 |
> the front-end. Now the front-end should represent the back-end in a |
45 |
> human readable form and not simplify to fit the least knowledged. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> BUT, i guess (from what ive heard) grub2 is fine with editing it by |
48 |
> hand. And the command does really only assist in the simpliest |
49 |
> matter, only combines all actions you'd have to take yourself. |
50 |
> Thanks for the clearance. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> (If you want to criticise the above big block of text, I always fail to |
53 |
> express myself well.) |
54 |
> |