Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: John Jolet <john@×××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] tar over ssh
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 03:27:42
Message-Id: 06DB55D2-E986-4FCF-8FA1-D68DC14F24F0@jolet.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] tar over ssh by Ow Mun Heng
1 On Jan 24, 2006, at 9:10 PM, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
2
3 > On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 17:23 +0000, Francesco Riosa wrote:
4 >> Jeff wrote:
5 >>> Hey guys.
6 >>>
7 >>> I've got this big fat backup server with no space left on the
8 >>> hard drive
9 >>> to store a tar file. I'd like to pipe a tar through ssh, but not
10 >>> sure
11 >>> what the command would be. Something to the effect of:
12 >>>
13 >>> # cat /var/backup | ssh backup.homelan.com 'tar data.info.gz'
14 >>>
15 >>> So that, the data is actually being sent over ssh, and then
16 >>> archived on
17 >>> the destination machine.
18 >>>
19 >> tar -zcf - /var/backup | ssh backup.homelan.com "( cat >
20 >> data.info.gz )"
21 >>
22 >
23 > There's another way. This assumes your originating server's CPU is
24 > slow/precious and you have a 16 way node on a backup server (HAHA!!)
25 >
26 > tar cf - /var/backup | ssh backup.homelan.com "gzip -c >
27 > filename.tar.gz"
28 >
29 > But you transfer the stream uncompressed, so more bits get
30 > transferred.
31 >
32 you're kidding, right? Unless you've got a PII on the originating
33 end and are using gigabit ethernet between the two nodes, compressing
34 the data before transmission will almost always be faster. I tested
35 this scenerio extensively about 3 years ago, using linux, aix, and
36 solaris hosts. In no case was transferring uncompressed data faster
37 than compressing (at least to some degree) the data on the
38 originating server. And frankly, no matter what you do...wouldn't
39 you hope ALL the bits get transferred? :)
40 >
41 >
42 >
43 > --
44 > Ow Mun Heng
45 > Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz 1.5GB RAM
46 > 98% Microsoft(tm) Free!!
47 > Neuromancer 11:10:24 up 11:00, 6 users, load average: 1.08, 1.04, 1.15
48 >
49 >
50 > --
51 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
52 >
53
54 --
55 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] tar over ssh Ow Mun Heng <Ow.Mun.Heng@×××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] tar over ssh Tom Smith <tom71713-gentoo52478932@×××××.com>