1 |
Alexander Skwar schrieb: |
2 |
> Florian Philipp <f.philipp@××××××.de> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> star supports p7zip which can be much better and especially more |
5 |
>> flexible than bzip2, gzip and zip. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Uhm, what's bad about |
8 |
> |
9 |
> tar cf - | p7zip .... |
10 |
|
11 |
It's a bit cumbersome to create a pipe each time I access an archive. |
12 |
Well, I think I'll create a shell script or an alias for that. |
13 |
|
14 |
> |
15 |
>> If star were a fully qualified replacement for gnu tar, there would not |
16 |
>> have been the need to keep it |
17 |
> |
18 |
> To keep GNU tar, you mean? Well, there's at least a reason to not ONLY |
19 |
> have star: Star is made by Jörg Schilling, one of the biggest morons |
20 |
> on the earth. Guess why some distributions no longer use cdrecord but |
21 |
> switched to cdrkit? |
22 |
> |
23 |
>> I used find and grep to search for any implementations of tar |
24 |
>> compressing to stdout - I couldn't find any. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> What do you mean? |
27 |
> |
28 |
Just that I used regular expressions to search for tar writing to |
29 |
stdout, something that star can't, apparently. It seems it didn't work. |
30 |
Not all but some emerge actions failed while using star. |
31 |
|
32 |
>> I'll move /bin/tar to /bin/gnutar and make a symlink from /usr/bin/star |
33 |
>> to /bin/tar. |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>> Let's see if it works. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Command line options aren't identical. I wouldn't wonder if you run |
38 |
> into problems. |
39 |
> |
40 |
Well, most are. I ran into problems anyway (see above). So, I'm back to |
41 |
gnu tar. |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |