Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:11:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110624230834.7fadecd7@digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? by Stroller |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:02:23 +0100, Stroller wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I like the idea of package.use as a directory of indie files, but |
| 4 | > haven't bothered switching over because this works so well for me. The |
| 5 | > package.use directory system seems too simple to be true - is it really |
| 6 | > no more complex than a directory of any-named files of the same format? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Yes. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Neil Bothwick |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Top Oxymorons Number 3: Working vacation |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |