From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | ||
Date: | Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:11:29 | ||
Message-Id: | 20110624230834.7fadecd7@digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? by Stroller |
1 | On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:02:23 +0100, Stroller wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > I like the idea of package.use as a directory of indie files, but |
4 | > haven't bothered switching over because this works so well for me. The |
5 | > package.use directory system seems too simple to be true - is it really |
6 | > no more complex than a directory of any-named files of the same format? |
7 | |
8 | Yes. |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Neil Bothwick |
13 | |
14 | Top Oxymorons Number 3: Working vacation |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |