Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] btrfs: subvol without compression
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:01:27
Message-Id: 53A4228A.2090502@xunil.at
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] btrfs: subvol without compression by Marc Joliet
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Am 20.06.2014 12:07, schrieb Marc Joliet:
5 > I don't know if you eventually found an answer yourself, but since
6 > nobody else has replied, here's what I found:
7
8 [..]
9
10 > From my own google search, at least up to 2011 per-subvolume
11 > compression settings were not possible. Then, after subsequently
12 > searching on the btrfs wiki for a while, I finally found an answer:
13 > no. See this FAQ entry:
14 >
15 > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Can_I_mount_subvolumes_with_different_mount_options.3F
16 >
17 > [...]
18
19
20 Nice, thanks.
21
22 I think btrfs is clever enough anyway to detect that the blocks aren't
23 compressible anymore ... so I can leave it at defaults.
24
25 Stefan
26 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
27 Version: GnuPG v2
28 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
29
30 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTpCKKAAoJEClcuD1V0PzmXMEP/jv/m4ueKBUVEjbUMFlUR0ph
31 fHHFuzzg1OV6ealGl9KI4vbyBJqJXQ2+WkSDsIoO+fxxnW06uuVSv6IaphcWnd0o
32 0orfd56OPiPRop+dkDirviWQ4J4o+9MQLIBBQOKsM0pTiEx4X+hq0Q019T5eDYxL
33 Iw3H2BJ2Sa4thTj20IZ8e6L3j4iR7fjsJ+2viTDVooXk4+i5H2Jptzt0yyjB+fb/
34 bYTqLksSFHGlcX8C/xFquc8EhC1L//JtgQqRganreWLaoVNO9RCxAlTeB1vO57c4
35 6MPVfwSceINqdSM7Nqz17jsMbfrqNNdgwigeC45RsgUdDGcyFWqE7Jou6mQVR4Di
36 VHBY9SJ3xjO1p7BDN8gaIrbHDtCm8Xla/VuMONWI+BEGcT/AX0n1iakqA5HwypGw
37 c6QPYNmjONxXogIVIq0xCHwErt3rV6AuGrmGdfDjbHt1IfLloWAapBK6CFy8CVLR
38 Ie67eB/xrRO7iW5b30ZZWP2A81jsFWRec1ou8ynh9aN9Tu+NpuGx5TKVIRBrIpJo
39 kE2kkzHU2GurUxQnyIVwZJA0sTR1GF+2EkFiUGEnDIBBZ+ZEumC6ec4B1+nIeYX9
40 3Ss37SG2fbxBcL+m0lsdC+RZ0FqC0eXCovmPsztj3uDv4nfrDz1DDJUyqmRmzoC7
41 ovPCvppRyo/cnXntEmFH
42 =RZPZ
43 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----