Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 08:37:11
Message-Id: 20110521093539.088d62c9@digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5 by walt
1 On Fri, 20 May 2011 15:34:59 -0700, walt wrote:
2
3 > For you users of unstable gentoo: the recent update of 'icu' broke
4 > dozens of packages (as it always does) including libreoffice.
5
6 Although LO appears to continue working fine without the rebuild, at
7 least for my basic usage.
8
9 > The problem is that libreoffice fails to build if you have bison-2.5
10 > installed on your machine. A gentoo bug report was filed by our own
11 > Nikos Chantziaras -- who did not post a headsup to this list :p
12 >
13 > The fix is to downgrade bison to the 'stable' version 2.4.3, as stated
14 > in Nikos's bug report.
15
16 There's a patch to fix this without downgrading at
17
18
19 --
20 Neil Bothwick
21
22 QOTD:
23 The only easy way to tell a hamster from a gerbil is that the
24 gerbil has more dark meat.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature