Archives
Archives
| From: | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2 | ||
| Date: | Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:10:14 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200911100810.08168.michaelkintzios@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2 by Volker Armin Hemmann |
||
| 1 | On Tuesday 10 November 2009 07:44:14 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 2 | > this has been discussed to death. |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > Why don't you use google? |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > amarok has a hard dependency on mysql. There is nothing you can do about it |
| 7 | > with useflags. The amarok devs have explained that several times. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > (sqlite too slow with big collections, no way to share collections, too |
| 10 | > much work to support more than one db etc pp). |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Thanks Volker, I remember it being discussed, but didn't recall that mysql is |
| 13 | a must - I thought that the USE flags could still offer a way out. |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Regards, |
| 16 | Mick |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2 | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2 | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |