From: | Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo | ||
Date: | Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:59:01 | ||
Message-Id: | 521DD7D4.60709@libertytrek.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo by Joerg Schilling |
1 | On 2013-08-27 5:06 PM, Joerg Schilling |
2 | <Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
3 | > You wrote that modules become derivatives of the Linux kernel and this is the |
4 | > same as writing ZFS would become a kernel derivative. |
5 | |
6 | Just for clarification, I was talking about compiling ZFS support INTO |
7 | the kernel, not running it as a module. |
8 | |
9 | Do you claim that support for compiling ZFS directly into the kernel |
10 | also does not violate the license? |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo | Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de> |