| 1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:52:53 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>>> I wonder how effective tmpfs is for PORTAGE_TMPDIR as the builds |
| 6 |
>>> that need a lot of disk space can often require a fair bit of |
| 7 |
>>> memory too, and tmpfs is using it all. |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>> In this last week someone reported doing actually measurements and |
| 10 |
>> found that using a tmpfs was actually slower. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> Yes, but that was Dale and nothing works as it should for him :-O |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That one did. Someone on the forums posted the same results. It |
| 18 |
doesn't make sense but . . . . |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I can also say that I done a .35 kernel from scratch and can now |
| 21 |
download videos. So, I'm working again. :-P |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Dale |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
:-) :-) |
Archives