| 1 |
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 09:42, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dan Johansson wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tuesday 25 April 2006 07:33, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Dan Johansson wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> > On Monday 24 April 2006 20:04, Michael Sullivan wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> >> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:58 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> >> > I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> [...] |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> >> I think the one I use is called 'telnet-bsd'. It's just the |
| 12 |
> >> >> client... |
| 13 |
> >> > |
| 14 |
> >> > Thanks for the tip, but it is also client + server. (:-( |
| 15 |
> >> |
| 16 |
> >> Uhm - so? Just leave the server disabled. Where's the problem? |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Yes I know that I can just let the server disabled. But I was just |
| 19 |
> > wondering if there where any alternatives so that the server don't get |
| 20 |
> > started by "accident". |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> How should it get started by accident? You'll need root rights |
| 23 |
> to start it. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
By me at 06:00 AM after 24h wake time..... (;-) and like the most of us I've |
| 26 |
also done some stupid things during my 15+ years as UNIX/Linux admin. |
| 27 |
Seriously, as I said before I was just checking if there where any |
| 28 |
alternatives. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
So one again thanks for your input, |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Dan Johansson, <http://www.dmj.nu> |
| 33 |
*************************************************** |
| 34 |
This message is printed on 100% recycled electrons! |
| 35 |
*************************************************** |
Archives