From: | Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-user <Gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
Subject: | [gentoo-user] bindmount or symlink? |
Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2012 05:05:20 |
Message-Id: | CAA2qdGXRR0MEQ6WG3vKyskyeMwcXo0JjEuKnTX8wBMPYHgg9pQ@mail.gmail.com |
1 | I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories under /usr, |
2 | e.g., /usr/portage and /usr/source actually living somewhere else, on |
3 | different partition and different filesystem. Let's say something mounted |
4 | on /mnt/Persistent. |
5 | |
6 | My question: should I use bindmount or symlinks to do that? What's the |
7 | drawbacks/benefits for either? |
8 | |
9 | Rgds, |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] bindmount or symlink? | "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] bindmount or symlink? | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] bindmount or symlink? | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |