| 1 |
On Nov 19, 2011 11:58 AM, <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 08:41:43AM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote |
| 4 |
> > On Nov 19, 2011 6:56 AM, "Neil Bothwick" <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 09:38:42 +1100, Paul Colquhoun wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > > You can copy the ebuild to your own private overlay |
| 9 |
> > > > ( /usr/local/portage ) make your changes there, and bump the version |
| 10 |
> > > > number slightly. |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > No need to bump the version number, overlays take priority over the |
| 13 |
> > > standard tree when there are equal version numbers. |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > I knew I forgot something so simple >.< |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Thanks! |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > Hmmm... so, @waltdnes, you should modify the procedure a bit, there... |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Will do. This is what beta tests are for <G>. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Great! BTW, if the ebuild goes into overlay, it could use a newer EAPI, |
| 26 |
couldn't it? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
If it could, then it'll solve the problem of busybox[mdev]. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Rgds, |
Archives