1 |
On 2010-12-03, Jacob Todd <jaketodd422@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Dec 3, 2010 11:14 AM, "Grant Edwards" <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>> On 2010-12-03, Jacob Todd <jaketodd422@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> Gotta love gcc! |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> It's not gcc's fault. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Iirc there a bug in glibc that makes it almost impossible to create |
11 |
> static binaries with it. |
12 |
|
13 |
Yes, that's my understanding as well. Some design change somewhere |
14 |
between glibc4 and glibc6 makes it impossible to to static linking in |
15 |
any meaningful sense of the term. |
16 |
|
17 |
> I can't look the the sources of that info atm, but it be easily found |
18 |
> with google. Do the other platforms you use gcc to build static |
19 |
> binaries with use a different libc? |
20 |
|
21 |
Yes. That's how I know it's not gcc's fault: I can build static apps |
22 |
with gcc/binutils using a different libc. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! A shapely CATHOLIC |
26 |
at SCHOOLGIRL is FIDGETING |
27 |
gmail.com inside my costume.. |