| 1 |
Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:07:34PM +0100, Roman Naumann wrote: |
| 5 |
>> Here the whole configuration: (imagine it as a complicated line of different |
| 6 |
>> connections through the entire house...) |
| 7 |
>> [SNIP] |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Hm, I think in theory you should have the PC in the middle with 2 IP |
| 10 |
> addresses, on each interface different. On each segment (each side of |
| 11 |
> the middle one) should be IPs from different range and there should be |
| 12 |
> allowed routing (that I do not know how). It would look like this: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> -->( PC1 <IP-A/Range1> ) -- ( <IP-B/Range1> PC2 <IP-C/Range2> ) -- ( <IP-D/Range2> PC3 ) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> PC2 can comm with all (since it is on both nets). PC3 shloud use IP-C as |
| 17 |
> its gateway, which will allow it to access PC1. PC1 should have static |
| 18 |
> route for whole Range2 to IP-B, so it can send to PC3. Now, how is that |
| 19 |
> set in Windows, who knows.. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> After this all is set, PC1 and PC3 should be able to talk to each other. |
| 22 |
> However, you will not see the pings unless both directions work. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
...snip... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Yeah, this sounds pretty good to me. The subnet assignments are key, as |
| 27 |
is confirming connectivity at each point. Bridging on PC2 is a good |
| 28 |
choice too. Not sure if your WiFi router is really in bridge mode or |
| 29 |
not. Be sure its 'WAN' side is in Range1 and its 'LAN' side is in Range2. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
JT |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Web: http://www.signless.com |
| 35 |
E-Mail: jt@××××××××.com |
| 36 |
Voice: (503) 616-4816 |
| 37 |
Cell: (503) 419-8806 |
| 38 |
Skype: jt.justman |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives