1 |
lordsauronthegreat@×××××.com wrote: |
2 |
> On Monday 01 May 2006 10:57 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
3 |
>> lordsauronthegreat@×××××.com wrote: |
4 |
>> > On Sunday 30 April 2006 05:59 am, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
5 |
>> >> wu chuanwen wrote: |
6 |
|
7 |
>> >> Try a blank Firefox profile. To create one, run "firefox |
8 |
>> >> -ProfileManager". |
9 |
>> > |
10 |
>> > This is something like the third time you've suggested this. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> You counted? :) |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Not really. |
15 |
|
16 |
Aha. Why are you then giving an exact number? |
17 |
|
18 |
>> > Please explain |
19 |
>> > how this will help. I'm serious: I don't see how this could help. |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> My assumption: Problem is caused by bad settings, which includes |
22 |
>> extensions or themes. If problem goes away with a new/blank profile, |
23 |
>> we know where the problem is. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Yes, I'm just saying that it's highly unlikely that the profile is the |
26 |
> problem. |
27 |
|
28 |
Okay. What's the ground for your reasoning? As I wrote a few |
29 |
moments ago, my basis is, that I'm quite active in the German |
30 |
Mozilla newsgroups and thus see how often a blank profile solves |
31 |
problems. |
32 |
|
33 |
What about you? |
34 |
|
35 |
> I've never heard of a profile causing a problem in my life. |
36 |
|
37 |
Well, that's obviously because you don't read much. |
38 |
|
39 |
> I |
40 |
> could be wrong, |
41 |
|
42 |
I wouldn't wonder. |
43 |
|
44 |
> but I'm still skeptical nonetheless. |
45 |
|
46 |
Why? |
47 |
|
48 |
You're a very strange person. But that's to be expected by |
49 |
people with such a "cool" nickname. |
50 |
|
51 |
Alexander Skwar |
52 |
-- |
53 |
If rabbits' feet are so lucky, what happened to the rabbit? |
54 |
-- |
55 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |