1 |
On 10/12/2013 20:28, Bruce Hill wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 05:52:36PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> The only thing portage can do is assume you want everything to work |
5 |
>> under all installed interpreters. If you want to restrict the list of |
6 |
>> installed interpreters, use the relevant settings in make.conf. Python |
7 |
>> has PYTHON_TARGETS and SINGLE_PYTHON_TARGET for this, I don't know what |
8 |
>> the ruby equivalent is. |
9 |
>> -- |
10 |
>> Alan McKinnon |
11 |
>> alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
12 |
> |
13 |
> mingdao@workstation ~ $ grep ruby /etc/portage/make.conf |
14 |
> RUBY_TARGETS="ruby20" |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Can't imagine you didn't know that. Ruby hater? :D |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
You could say that: |
21 |
|
22 |
$ grep -ir -C1 ruby /etc/portage |
23 |
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use- # I see no need for lvm thin |
24 |
volumes. And it needs thin-provisioning-tools |
25 |
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use: # which needs ruby. I do not want |
26 |
ruby. |
27 |
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use- sys-fs/lvm2 -thin |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
But the real reason I don't have ruby is I don't have a use for it |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Alan McKinnon |
37 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |