| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:07 on Wednesday 25 May 2011, Paul Hartman |
| 2 |
did opine thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Stéphane Guedon <stephane@××××××××××.eu> |
| 5 |
wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Hello |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Some of you tried both LibreOffice / OpenOffice / Calligra recently ? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > What do you think of them ? Which is stable / not yet fully finish ? ... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> They are both very mature and stable and should be able to do almost |
| 13 |
> anything you need, as long as that need is not 100% MS-compatibility. |
| 14 |
> ;) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
LibreOffice comes with a huge benefit - I do not have to see the Oracle logo |
| 17 |
on the splash screen. That alone was enough to make me switch. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Other than that, I reckon they are mostly on par with each other for the |
| 20 |
average user. According to some recent blogs I scanned over, LibreOffice ships |
| 21 |
with more templates or makes the process easier. I can see how many people |
| 22 |
would like that a lot. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives