| 1 |
Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Friday 18 Mar 2016 19:29:29 wabenbau@×××××.com wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > What I miss most of all is the fantastic konqueror. It was way |
| 6 |
> > better than any other filemanager that I know. Of course I've |
| 7 |
> > tested the KDE4 konqueror and also dolphin but it was horrible |
| 8 |
> > compared to the old konqueror. Now I'm using thunar. It's far away |
| 9 |
> > from being perfect, but it seems to be the lesser of the evils. ;-) |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > -- |
| 12 |
> > Regards |
| 13 |
> > wabe |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I'm still using Konq rather than dolphin as a file manager and |
| 16 |
> continue to be happy with it. :-) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> What's stopping you using it? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
It's some years ago and when I'm honest, I can't remember exactly |
| 21 |
what displeased me. :-) |
| 22 |
IIRC one thing was that the detailed view mode was not as compact |
| 23 |
as it was with konqueror3. And there were some problems with the |
| 24 |
theme (missing icons and some other glitches). And IIRC I also |
| 25 |
missed some functions. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Maybe I will try it again with KDE5. But this also depends on the |
| 28 |
dependencies. :-) I'm not sure if I'm willing to install the complete |
| 29 |
KDE environment for this test. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Regards |
| 33 |
wabe |
Archives