Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Has semantic-desktop really become compulsatory for kmail?
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:21:50
Message-Id: 58965d8a1002110821k1f458433na592e85a6b955997@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Has semantic-desktop really become compulsatory for kmail? by "Jörg Schaible"
1 On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@×××.de> wrote:
2 > Well, in 4.3.x I eliminated it after the first try, because it took so many
3 > resources of my machine, that I could not use it for something else. So, you
4 > mean, in 4.4.x it takes only a 10% of the resources it took with 4.3.x? LOL,
5 > although I really like the idea of the semantic desktop, I rather have a
6 > usable machine ...
7
8 I tried it again in KDE 4.4, and other than virtuoso taking 100% with
9 a bug (I killed it and it behaved normally after that) I didn't
10 experience any extreme load even during the initial indexing. However,
11 I disabled it after a couple hours of indexing because it was already
12 using a few gigabytes of disk and I simply don't find it useful.