| 1 |
John covici wrote: |
| 2 |
> Thanks all -- I have a 32-bit profile, so I guess I will not be able |
| 3 |
> to use ncona -- is this correct? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
No, it's not correct. "march=nocona" is just as valid under 32 bits as |
| 7 |
64. It simply defines the capabilities of your processor to gcc. It does |
| 8 |
NOT force gcc to produce 64 bit code. With later versions of gcc, |
| 9 |
"march=native" may be a better choice but, with the current stable gcc, |
| 10 |
"march=nocona" is the best choice. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Be lucky, |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Neil |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
This message has been scanned for viruses and |
| 20 |
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is |
| 21 |
believed to be clean. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives