1 |
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 17:18:56 David W Noon wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:20:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: |
3 |
> [gentoo-user] Boot partitions (WAS: migrating disks (from mounts to |
4 |
> |
5 |
> disklabels: |
6 |
> >On Sunday 21 November 2010 16:22:15 David W Noon wrote: |
7 |
> >> What I suspect is in the remainder of that space is a hidden primary |
8 |
> >> partition containing a "transparent" bootstrap that augments the BIOS |
9 |
> >> and permits booting from a logical/extended partition. This would be |
10 |
> >> similar to the old OS/2 Boot Manager, although that was hardly |
11 |
> >> transparent. This hidden partition was probably placed there by |
12 |
> >> cfdisk when you first partitioned the drive and started it with an |
13 |
> >> extended partition. The OS/2 FDISK.COM did something similar when |
14 |
> >> the first partition on a drive was not a primary (including Boot |
15 |
> >> Manager). |
16 |
> >> |
17 |
> >> A forensic examination of that area would be of interest. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> >Including attempting creation of three more primary partitions. If |
20 |
> >your hunch is right, the last will not be created as the allowable |
21 |
> >four exist already. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> No, only 1 primary and Neil's extended partition would currently |
24 |
> exist. So it should be possible to create 2 more primaries, if there |
25 |
> were space on the disk. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> >I don't believe your hunch is right though - it's just too complex to |
28 |
> >be worthwhile for any but a very few customers. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Not at all complex. OS/2 has had the option to work that way since |
31 |
> about 1987 on 80286 hardware (and written by Microsoft). |
32 |
> |
33 |
> >Nobody's answered my parenthetical question though: why do SCSI and |
34 |
> >IDE interfaces allow different total numbers of partitions? |
35 |
> |
36 |
> They don't. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> The number of primary/extended partitions is limited to 4, and the |
39 |
> number of logical drives is limited by the size of the extended |
40 |
> partition. If you can fit more partitions onto one drive than another, |
41 |
> it is because either the drive is bigger or the partitions are smaller. |
42 |
|
43 |
Errm, not exactly. SCSI/SATAs are limited to 15 (inc. one extended partition) |
44 |
and old (legacy driven) IDEs are limited to some 63 partitions if I recall |
45 |
correctly. If you use the new libata I think you only get 15 partitions for |
46 |
SATA/PATA. |
47 |
|
48 |
I know, because I remember some years ago getting a bit over-enthusiastic with |
49 |
a new SATA drive and fdisk only to end up with partitions that I couldn't |
50 |
mount ... O_o |
51 |
-- |
52 |
Regards, |
53 |
Mick |